Having trouble viewing this newsletter in email? View online here.The Elephant in the BBC News Roomby E. Calvin Beisner, Ph.D., Founder…" />
--
 

May 17, 2012

Key Documents

 
 
 
 

Get the Newsletter

Newsletter Archives

 
 
 

Newsletter (August 3, 2011)

Having trouble viewing this newsletter in email? View online here.

The Elephant in the BBC News Room

by E. Calvin Beisner, Ph.D., Founder and National Spokesman, Cornwall Alliance

Last month the BBC, Britain’s state-sponsored news broadcasting system, got advice from its governing body, the BBC Trust: Pay less attention to scientists who question catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW), and more to those who affirm it.

If you’ve followed BBC’s coverage, exemplified in the first part of this video, you may wonder whether that’s even possible, but set that aside for the moment.

Nathan Rao, reporting for Express.co.uk, summarized it this way: “…coverage should not be tailored to represent a ‘false balance’ of opinion if one side came from a minority group.”

Critics of CAGW are up in arms about the advice, focusing on alleged bias on the part of Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics at University College, London, on whose “independent review” the Trust’s report was based. (He has close ties to the BBC.)

The Trust responded, “The point Professor Jones makes is that the scientific consensus is that it is caused by human activity. Therefore the BBC’s coverage needs to give less weight to those who oppose this view, and reflect the fact that the debate has moved on to how to deal with climate change.”

How biased Jones was is one question. The elephant in the living room—or the news room—is that consensus simply isn't scientifically relevant. The Trust’s decision confuses science with sociology and psychology.

If there is a scientific consensus on a hypothesis or theory, its existence is a psychological or sociological phenomenon, not to be confused with the consensus itself or the evidence that the consensus exists.

If journalists want to write stories on the legitimately interesting story of how many scientists believe or deny this or that, that's fine, but it's not science, it's sociology or psychology. But if they want to report on the science itself, they must actually do stories that explore the kinds of evidence and inferences scientists use to support their views and critique others' views. The numbers of scientists who embrace any given theory is irrelevant.

If 2,000 scientists offer a total of 3 arguments based on 3 types of observation and inference in favor of a theory, and 20 offer a total of 30 arguments based on 30 types of observation and inference against it, the latter should get more coverage as a science story, even if not as a story on the sociology or psychology of science, because it will take more coverage to convey their arguments.

And that is the case with CAGW. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and warmists in general explicitly ignore or downplay as irrelevant important natural phenomena to which skeptics give a great deal of attention: solar radiance and magnetic wind cycles, cosmic ray influx cycles, ocean circulation cycles, and more. A truly even-handed reporter will pay more attention to the greater number of different types of arguments, regardless how many people advance them.

Two Worldviews: Biblical Stewardship and Radical Environmentalism

Author and National Radio Host Janet Parshall discusses the fundamental difference between Christianity and Radical Environmentalism. On the one hand you have stewardship of the earth and its resources; on the other, worship of the earth as God. The two are incompatible.


National Religious Broadcasters' NRB Network Airs Resisting the Green Dragon
Selections from the Cornwall Alliance’s groundbreaking Resisting the Green Dragon video series are airing on Tuesdays at 8 p.m. ET on the NRB Network, viewable over DirecTV’s Channel 378, Sky Angel’s Channel 126, and streaming live at http://www.nrbnetwork.tv/watchonline.

Order Resisting the Green Dragon for Church, School, or Small Group

More and more churches and other groups are using Cornwall Alliance’s groundbreaking 13-part video series around the country. With its printable discussion guide, it provides full curriculum for a Sunday school quarter. The accompanying book helps teachers and others dig deeper.

Join Cornwall Alliance Facebook Group Page

To keep up with relevant developments on a daily basis, join Cornwall Alliance’s Facebook Group page, where we and group members will post and discuss items daily.


Recent Significant Developments

Science & Ecology

2011 U.S. Temperature Update: Alarmism Not (Chris Knappenberger; Masterresource.org)
Just in case you thought the recent heat wave around much of the U.S. was extraordinary or new evidence for global warming (manmade or otherwise), think again. The “data” aren’t very reliable. And, Patrick Michaels points out, "There is no statistically significant warming trend since November of 1996 in monthly surface temperature records. …"

A World Food Crisis? (Fred Singer; American Thinker)
Global warming is more likely to increase than decrease global food production. Why? Let me count the ways ….

Economics & Energy

The Promise and the Over-Promise (Marvin Olasky; World)
Ending extreme poverty is a noble goal. Many proposals for how to reach it, however, ignore the importance of worldview and societal institutions. Marvin Olasky warns here of the failure of some Christian charities to consider that. His warnings are sound, and I add my hearty second to his recommendations of Brian Fikkert and Steve Corbett’s When Helping Hurts: Alleviating Poverty without Hurting the Poor … and Ourselves and, especially, Hernando de Soto’s two monumental books The Other Path: The Economic Answer to Terrorism (update and revision of his 1989 The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World) and The Mystery of Capitalism: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else, the latter the most important and insightful book I’ve read in nearly thirty years studying the field. Indeed, one clear lesson is that just “spreading the wealth around” through charitable giving, especially when done through government-run foreign aid, not only doesn’t help the poor but helps perpetuate the conditions, including the oppressive governments, that cause their poverty, as demonstrated in Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa and William Easterly’s The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Help the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good

Inhibiting an Oil and Gas Boom (Paul Chesser; The American Spectator)
"The fossil fuel shale extraction industry, where technological advancements and discoveries of huge reserves of oil and natural gas hold great promise for the nation's future energy needs, is under attack."

The Latest Job Killer From the EPA (John Engler; The Wall Street Journal)
"The agency's ozone rule will be the most expensive in history—and isn't required by law."

Religion & Ethics

The Debilitating Disease of Climate Alarmism (Climate Change Reconsidered)
“Yes, we live in truly disturbing times, when climate alarmists are proclaiming one impending catastrophe after another, if anthropogenic CO2 emissions are not drastically reduced; and there is absolutely no question but that the responsibility for the resultant widespread and growing state of irrational depression, anxiety and stress that is manifesting itself throughout the world can be laid squarely at the doorstep of those who peddle climatic doom and gloom, and that the perverse results of their perturbing of the psyches of millions of people will bring nothing but anguish and remorse as rewards for their woefully misguided efforts.”

“Building Trust” and FOI Refusals (Steve McIntyre; Climate Audit)
A good explanation of why we can't trust alarmist climate scientists generally. Anyone among them who isn't openly, publicly, insistently urging his colleagues in the climate science community to practice complete transparency and sharing of data and stop all the obstructionism defines himself, too, as one not to be trusted.

Law, Regulation, & Litigation

Indefensible (Paul Chesser; The American Spectator)
That Environmental Defense Fund’s latest advertising campaign spreads false information about risks from mercury emissions is reason enough to read this article carefully. Perhaps even more compelling is its discussion of the unethical legal game the Environmental Protection Agency and environmental pressure groups like EDF play, to the considerable benefit of both sides but to the impoverishment of taxpayers. “The bill that EDF so strenuously objects to reduces EPA funding by 18 percent, and its funding for climate change programs by 22 percent. This not only cuts into EPA's police power, but also has the potential to harm an EDF cash flow that it enjoys by recovering its attorney fees after suing EPA. As former Bush EPA official Jeffrey Holmstead explained to Investor’s Business Daily recently, ‘The EPA isn't harmed by these suits. Often the suits involve things the EPA wants to do anyway. By inviting a lawsuit and then signing a consent decree, the agency gets legal cover from political heat.’"

"Right Out of Atlas Shrugged": Hear an Exasperated Alabama Businessman Tell the Feds – "I’m Just Quitting" (Dave Urbanski; The Blaze)
This isn't theory, folks. It's life. Hard, brute-fact life. Green ideologues will never wake up to it. But ordinary people like you and me had better wake up and tell the Greens they're not going to force all of us to live out their misanthropic dreams (er--nightmares). This one's definitely worth reading--twice.

Show us the bodies, EPA (Steve Milloy; The Washington Times)
"Green agency uses phony death statistics to justify job-killing rules."

Politics & Debate

The Global Warming Debate Al Gore Refused To Have (Noel Sheppard; News Busters)
This debate, between Lord Christopher Monckton and economist Dr. Richard Dennis, well illustrates the difference between constant appeals to authority (done by Dennis) and constant use of actual evidence (done by Monckton).

Manufacturing(?) Consensus (Judith Curry; Climate Etc.)
"The IPCC needs to lose the emphasis on consensus and pay far more attention to understanding uncertainty and to actual reasoning."

Meet the Critics: Anthony R. Lupo, Ph.D

Landmark Documents from the Cornwall Alliance


E. Calvin Beisner, Ph.D., Founder and National Spokesman
Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation

Information in this newsletter is for scholarly and educational use only and may not be copied or reproduced for any other purposes without prior permission of the copyright holders.

 

    logo