|
Articles
- Climate Change in a Nutshell
Scientific, moral and theological implications of climate policy
(February 28, 2006)
Few issues in recent years have fueled public debate as has global warming…. Global warming certainly involves fierce debates over how to interpret complicated and incomplete scientific data, and whether computer models can competently analyze complex weather and climate systems and cycles that still are not well understood. But it also features equally fulsome discussions about energy costs and the protocol’s many significant implications for nations, families and industries.
Today, another dynamic is also beginning to receive increasing attention. It is the emerging assessment of the moral and religious implications of climate change policy. CA
- Appeal Letter to the National Association of Evangelicals on the Issue of Global Warming
Leading evangelicals ask NAE to refrain from taking a position on climate change issue
(January 31, 2006)
We respectfully request…that the NAE not adopt any official position on the issue of global climate change. Global warming is not a consensus issue, and our love for the Creator and respect for
His creation does not require us to take a position.
We are evangelicals and we care about God’s creation. However, we believe there should be room for Bible-believing evangelicals to disagree about the cause, severity and solutions to the global warming issue. CA
- An Examination of the Scientific, Ethical and Theological Implications of Climate Change Policy
(November 21, 2005)
Few issues have permeated or fueled public debate like the topic of global warming…. There is [a new] dynamic to this topic that is beginning to receive increasing attention – namely, the emerging assessment of the moral and religious implications of climate change policy. CA
- Get Out Your Bed Nets
We must let Africans fight mosquitoes and disease the same way we do: with pesticides
(October 31, 2005)
These are life-or-death decisions for malaria-endemic countries. They have the right to make decisions based on science and effective use of resources, without fear of reprisals. America would never tell hurricane survivors they must rely on bed nets and anti-malaria drugs that are in critically short supply, or simply don’t work. Telling Africans to do so violates their most basic human rights. CA
- How Will We Feed Africa?
(October 31, 2005)
Environmental activists are spending millions of dollars in their campaign to ban genetically modified foods, as millions of Africans starve. These activists, who must believe that ideology is a good substitute for bread on the table, need to understand some simple truths. CA
|
